Recently, much
work has focused on the development of inorganic materials in bone tissue
engineering, such as glass and glass scaffolds. These inorganic materials
classified as “bioactive” should first pass an in vitro test in simulated body fluid (SBF).In the test, an inert
buffer to keep neutral pH is necessary to maintain conditions close to those in
blood plasma. According to an international standard (ISO:23317:2014) for the
test, Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane is using to maintain neutral pH in SBF.
In 2011,
Rohanova et al. found that TRIS buffer used with a highly reactive
glass-ceramic scaffold accelerates the dissolution of the glass-ceramic
crystalline phase and lead to the formation of hydroxyapatite. It demonstrates that
TRIS buffer is not suitable for in vitro testing. So other alternatives must be sought.
Rohanova et al.
evaluated whether would HEPES buffer be more suitable for SBF. They studied the
interaction of HEPES buffer with the glass-ceramic scaffold (45S5 bioactive
glass-based) through comparing SBF with HEPES and demineralized water with
HEPES. The tested scaffold was exposed to the media under a static-dynamic
arrangement for 15 days. Leachate samples were collected daily for analysis Ca2+ ions and Si, (PO4)3- ions, and to measure pH. The
glass-ceramic scaffold was analyzed by SEM/EDS, XRD, and WD-XRF before and
after 0.3,1,3,7,11,15 days of exposure. Their results confirmed the rapid
selective dissolution of the glass-ceramic crystalline phase containing Ca2+ ions due to the presence of HEPES, hydroxyapatite supersaturation being
reached within 24 h in both solutions. These results suggest that HEPES is also
not suitable for the in vitro testing
of highly reactive inorganic biomaterials (glass, glass-ceramics).
In a word,
findings of Rohanova et al. show that TRIS and HEPES buffers are not suitable
to maintain the neutral pH for the in
vitro testing. Consequently, researcher will work further to test other
buffers to find suitable alternatives.
没有评论:
发表评论